Goetter Blog
The palpitating adventures of Lucile, Samuel, Cathie and Raphael Goetter. A small unpretentious family blog with photos, books, stories of CSS, of babies and dirty layers
For or against the modification photo?
Category: And apart this? 3 Comments
Further to the creation of my personal portfolio, I publish henceforth some of my articles on the site Strasbourg-photo.com
This article was moved at this address:
Comments
3 Answers to For or against the modification photo?
-
May 23rd, 2008 21:18
For my part, I speak photo rather of development. As well for the argentique that for numerical, the photo at the exit of the apparatus (negative or raw) requires to be put in value to give all its potential.
It is sure, some compact apparatus make it automatically and boost neatness or contrasts, what is not the case of r flex.Therefore the part development, I do not consider it so much to be a modification (roughly all that it is possible to make with Lightroom or Aperture).
Where this becomes of the modification, it is the rubbing-out of an electrical post that spoils the landscape, the emphasis of the fuzziness of objective on a portrait, the modification of selective colour, the inlaying of new elements in the picture etc )
-
May 24th, 2008 12:24
100 % in agreement with you Raphael and Stephan!
When I was at the school and what I had courts of photo, we were learnt to make of the post treatment under the enlarger! And the same front this, in the development of the film to force contrasts, to clarify the film when they knew that she was under displaying. I was even learnt to make a sky darker, to add him clouds!
-
May 26th, 2008 14:42
Good morning Raphael:)
Sometimes the border between the post treatment and the modification is narrow I share your opinion, the modification begins in abolition or addition of elements
dom